Zinianz is a new publisher of open access articles with open and post publication peer-review.
Zinianz is a group of professionals working with a common plan to get publication access open to members of all races and research ethnic group. Zinianz moves forward with a motive towards right conduct in research making its mark in extensive promotions of research through scientific networking increasing visibility for the articles published. Zinianz best provides our stakeholders in publishing their innovations with different feature enhanced formats, which has a wide scope in reaching to the people for better understanding of a research outcome.
Zinianz publishes scientific literature written by authors in the field of Bio-Medicine, Medical Sciences, and Life Sciences in ContROL.
Zinianz publish scientific outcomes as research articles written by doctors, scientists, professors, researchers, professionals, and research scholars online only (Open-Access) and no other print publications is authorized by Zinianz Publishing Pvt. Ltd.
Yes, ContROL (Continuous Research Online Library) is a journal that publishes Research, Review, Case Reports, Editorials, Letter to Editors, and Short Communication articles.
ContROL is an Open- Access journal with open and post publication peer-review and no other mode of the publication process is followed.
A Preprint is a print ahead of original publication, published online before any conductance of the peer-review process with a well-organized structure as publication. Assigning DOI (Digital Object Identifier) for an article that is useful for an author which shows his publication online without any delay in publication as followed by traditional publishers earlier.
The open peer-review is a process of peer-review where an author identifies reviewers and editors. Zinianz operates its journal (ContROL) by open peer-review process, where the recommendations given by reviewers and editors were published online with a DOI for their recommendations.
Post-Publication peer-review is a process of reviewing articles after publication (Preprint) and followed ethically in Zinianz operates open peer-review model, where author written articles published and later reviewers are invited to give recommendations with their valuable insights technically and scientifically.
Versions are the revisions submitted by authors with all the corrections made as per recommendations suggested by reviewers and editors for its subsequent version publication.
The decisions given by reviewers and editors were published online and can be viewed on each article that mentions an editor or reviewer’s recommendations may be as Accept or Major Revision, or Minor Revision.
An article is sent for peer-review once after assigning a DOI for publication of the article as Preprint.
The article is made available for revision submission by authors once after its conductance of peer-review and after successful recommendations suggested by reviewers and editors assigned to the corresponding article.
No article cannot be withdrawn once after submission to Zinianz, at most care taken to an article from the initial stage of article processing, and a much effort is taken to publish a Preprint in the form of formatting and initial grammar check and sentence corrections for the article.
The manuscript submitted by authors should be in the format as in the type of the article, grammar check, manuscript editing to get published online as Preprint. Once, after successful post publication peer-review (openly) considering the reviewers and editor’s recommendations those who have been assigned to the article to take care of, will be given a decision and based on their recommendations the article will be published online and will be open for further discussions.
As this is an open peer-review model and each author is made visible their reviewer who gives recommendations for their manuscript, will also be shown to the author and our audience what the reviewer has recommended for a certain manuscript. So that users may be aware of the research and technical issues for the manuscript and may be a helpful for other authors not to make the same mistakes while writing an article. The reports can be citeable as DOI for the reports were assigned and made available online.
Certain User and Review comments Terms and Conditions have been mentioned in our website in the Terms and Conditions section, unless users breaches the guidelines will be a part of our team or else will be removed from his current position with Zinianz also their comments.
The article gets REJECTED if it has found more than two negative review recommendations before publishing its final version of the article. If an article is found to be commenting negative reviews after a post publication of its final version, then it is on authors hand in how to write a rebuttal comment to the one stated.
The reviewer for an article will be selected by the editor to whom the article has been assigned and in at times if the editor is absent for a day or two without neglecting the peer-review process flow the staff of Zinianz will act as a managing editor and selects an eminent and suitable reviewer.
If in case an author wants his review to be recommended by a specific author whom he feels fit and wants his suggestions for his research, then the author should mention the details of that particular research and suggest him as a reviewer for his article along with the competing interests if any for the same.
An Editor for an article can review that particular article once after submission before Preprint and once after the recommendations given by our reviewers assigned to that particular article. If editor alone wants to state the final review recommendations, then he/she should be able to answer the reasons for the non-conductance of the peer-review process along with the reasons doing this.
Yes, they were asked to state any of such competing interests before they agree for a manuscript to handle.
The journal staff has always be helpful for users in assisting each and everyone who has any of the inconvenience in any situations and at any time of their review and publication process. Particularly in reviewing, where it is a heart of the publication process and the staff will without any hesitation will contact the reviewer for his/her delay in submitting their recommendations.
Certainly, if the author is requested by our honourable editor to act as a reviewer then will be a reviewer for that particular article in which he is nowhere found as an author, and asked for competing interests if any for the same.
Yes, the author will be given a chance to write a rebuttal for each recommendation and comments given to an article pre-publication and post-publication of their subsequent revision submission. The author who writes a rebuttal letter will also be given a REFUTER medal as our attribution towards his commitment.
We do charge for an article the processing charges in order to run the journal in an organized structure. Regarding APC and also the discounts and waivers, please follow the below mentioned link for further details.
No, we are only charging for the word count in the main content of an article regardless of its Abstract, Figures, and Tables.
No, we do not charge any fees for its subsequent revision submissions and their publication. It is free for the authors and can make changes wherever possible in the manuscript and any number of times the author can send their recent version reports even after their final publication with recommendations from reviewers as accept.
Yes, we do give discounts/ waivers for our varied customers. Kindly go through the below mentioned link for a detailed description for discounts/waivers we provide for our stakeholders.
No, we do not charge any publication charges for Multimedia services we give. All the multimedia promotions can be freely accessible.
All articles have assigned a DOI. The article should be cited as stated below, where the current version and editor’s recommendation status (may be as “Accepted” or “Rejected” or “Revise”) is compulsory to mention in an article to be cited as we are following a traditional publication process, it is mandatory in mentioning while citing.
All reviewer recommendations given for are assigned a DOI publication. It means the recommendations can also be cited as an article citation. The format for recommendations given should be mentioned while citing as:
ContROL articles are usually published under a CC-BY license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and leaves the copyright of the article with the current copyright holder (usually the author or their institution). Additional waivers are used for some governmental employees, as appropriate. As the specific version of the CC-BY license applied may change due to periodic updates, the copyright information is shown below the abstract.
ContROL publishes Research, Review, Case Reports, Editorials, Letter to Editors, and Short Commentary articles along with reviewer’s recommendations.
Multimedia is used for article promotions and to make digitalise the content in the format that allows our audience feel digitally and make them flexible in gaining knowledge without any efforts and for easy understandings.
Interactive cases were published for selected articles which may be so broad in their subject wise domains, and can be able to make a discussion where technical and scientific knowledge from their writings be used for further interactions and for testing one’s capability.